Most interview advice focuses on what to study: algorithms, system design, common behavioral questions. But in reality, many interviews don’t fail because of missing knowledge — they fail because answers are unclear, unfocused, or poorly structured.
I ran into this problem while preparing for interviews on my own. I knew the material, but I wasn’t sure how my answers actually sounded to someone on the other side of the table.
That’s when I started experimenting with AI-assisted interview practice.
Instead of reviewing lists of questions, I tried responding in full sentences, as if someone were listening. The interesting part wasn’t the answers themselves, but the
ai interview assistant — seeing where I rambled, where I skipped context, and where I assumed too much.
Tools like Linkjob.ai approach interviews less as a test and more as a conversation. The focus isn’t on memorizing “perfect” answers, but on learning how to organize thoughts under pressure. For behavioral questions especially, this makes a noticeable difference.
What surprised me most was how small changes — clearer openings, better structure, more concrete examples — quickly improved confidence. Not because the answers were smarter, but because they were easier to follow.
I still believe real interviews and human feedback matter most. But for solo practice, having something that pushes you to speak clearly and reflect on your responses fills a gap that books and notes don’t.
For anyone preparing alone and feeling “ready, but not fluent,” this approach to practice is worth considering.
Comments (0)